Skip to content

The pledge — published 27 October 2026

No deliberate rug pulls.

This is a statement about conduct, not about outcomes. It says how the project commits to behaving. It does not say anything about price, returns, survival or safety, and nothing on this website can enforce it.

KLEAR commits, in public and on the record, that it will not deliberately mislead the people who support it — and will not intentionally engineer a rug pull.

Clauses

What the pledge commits to

Open a clause to read what it commits the project to — and, in the same panel, what it does not promise. The second half is the part that keeps a commitment honest.

Limits

What this pledge cannot do

It cannot be enforced by a website

A commitment published here is a statement the project can be held to in public. It is not a contract with any holder, not a security, and not something this website can activate on your behalf.

It says nothing about price

Good conduct does not create demand. A token can fall to zero while every statement made about it remains true, and a project that behaves honestly can still fail.

It is not a substitute for checking

Everything stated here is a claim until you can reproduce it yourself — in an explorer, in a dated record, or in a wallet balance. Where a claim cannot be checked, this site says so.

In one line

No deliberate rug pulls is a commitment about how KLEAR intends to behave. It is not a guarantee of profit, of price performance, of liquidity, of the project's survival, or that holding the token cannot lose you money.

Disclosure

Wallet, selling and treasury policies

Five policies that decide what a creator can do to the people holding a token. Each one below shows its current status, exactly what will be published, and what publishing it would still not prove.

Separate wallets are not separate owners

One person can control any number of addresses. A list of wallets is only meaningful when you add the holdings together and read the combined figure — which is why a single disclosed allocation is better evidence than a count of addresses.